Blog

Don’t Risk It: Why Proper PPE Is Your Best Defence Against Workplace Injuries and Legal Trouble

The image effectively represents workplace safety, compliance with the OHS Act, and the diversity of the South African workforce.

Every day, thousands of South African workers face hazards that could change their lives in seconds — from falling objects to chemical exposure and electrical shocks.
The right Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) can mean the difference between a safe day at work and a serious injury.

But PPE is only one part of the bigger safety picture. True workplace protection starts with understanding how to control hazards before they reach your people.

This comprehensive guide will walk you through the key principles of workplace safety — from understanding the Hierarchy of Controls and the role of PPE, to compliance standards, certification requirements, and best practices that keep your business legally compliant and audit-ready.

By the end, you’ll know how to protect lives, prevent legal risks, and build a strong safety culture in your workplace.

Topics Covered in This Blog Post

Workplace safety is not only about wearing a hard hat or gloves. It begins long before anyone puts on protective gear. True safety starts with understanding risks, planning ahead, and creating an environment where everyone values safety.

Every day, thousands of workers around the world face hazards that could cause serious injuries or even death. In South Africa, many of these incidents could have been prevented with better safety systems, awareness, and the right use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

To manage workplace risks effectively, safety experts use something called the Hierarchy of Controls. This is a structured approach developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and supported by South Africa’s Department of Employment and Labour. It helps organizations identify the best methods to prevent harm, starting with the most effective options and ending with PPE, which is the last line of defence.

Let’s explore how this system works in simple, practical terms.

Infographic showing the Hierarchy of Controls pyramid: Elimination, Substitution, Engineering Controls, Administrative Controls, and PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), ranked from most to least effective, credited to NIOSH.

The Hierarchy of Controls is like a ladder with five steps. Each step represents a different method for managing hazards. The higher you go on the ladder, the more effective and permanent the solution.

Here are the five levels of control:

1. Elimination – Removing the Hazard Completely

The safest and most effective way to protect workers is to eliminate the hazard altogether. If something is dangerous, remove it from the environment.

For example:
Instead of requiring workers to lift heavy boxes manually, install an automated lifting system. By doing so, you remove the risk of back injuries entirely. No hazard means no injury.

However, elimination is not always possible, especially in industries where the hazard is part of the job, such as construction or manufacturing. That is why we move to the next level.

2. Substitution – Replacing the Hazard with Something Safer

If you cannot eliminate the hazard, try to replace it with a less dangerous option.

For instance, if a cleaning process uses a toxic chemical, you can switch to a non-toxic or plant-based alternative. Workers perform the same task, but with far less risk to their health.

Substitution keeps the job running smoothly while reducing exposure to harmful substances or dangerous equipment.

3. Engineering Controls – Isolating People from the Hazard

When elimination and substitution are not possible, the next best solution is to design the workplace to keep people away from hazards.

This involves physical barriers or systems that control exposure. Examples include:

Engineering controls are powerful because they do not depend on workers remembering to take action. The safety feature is built into the environment.

4. Administrative Controls – Changing the Way People Work

Sometimes, safety can be improved by changing how tasks are performed or how work is organized. These are known as administrative controls.

Examples include:

Administrative controls rely on awareness, training, and good habits. They are not as strong as elimination or engineering solutions but are still an important part of a safety system.

5. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) – The Last Line of Defence

The final step in the hierarchy is Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). PPE is used when hazards cannot be removed or reduced by any other means. It provides a physical barrier between the worker and the hazard.

Examples of PPE include:

PPE protects workers from injuries caused by falling objects, sharp materials, chemical splashes, noise, and airborne particles.

However, PPE is only effective when it is used correctly, fits properly, and is regularly maintained. It should never be seen as a replacement for other safety measures. Instead, it should be viewed as the final layer of protection.

Seven industrial workers in PPE (hard hats, high-vis vests) reviewing a clipboard during a safety briefing in a warehouse, with signs for the OHS Act in the background.

PPE plays a critical role in preventing injuries in high-risk industries such as construction, mining, manufacturing, and laboratories. It protects workers from hazards that cannot be completely eliminated.

Beyond personal safety, proper PPE use also protects the company from legal and financial risks. When employees are injured, businesses face downtime, compensation claims, and possible penalties for non-compliance.

In South Africa, theOccupational Health and Safety Act (Act 85 of 1993)makes it clear that employers are legally required to provide suitable PPE free of charge and ensure that workers are trained to use it correctly.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is not just about safety – it’s about compliance with the law. In South Africa, workplace safety is guided by strict regulations that make employers responsible for protecting their employees from harm.

The Occupational Health and Safety Act (Act 85 of 1993) and related regulations clearly state that employers must identify risks, provide appropriate PPE, and ensure that it is properly used and maintained. Failing to meet these requirements doesn’t just risk worker injury – it can lead to serious legal consequences, fines, or even criminal liability.

In this part, we’ll explain what the law says, who is responsible for PPE, what the standards mean (SANS and NRCS), and how to make sure your business stays compliant.

The Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHS Act) is South Africa’s main workplace safety law. Its purpose is to ensure that every employer provides and maintains a safe and healthy working environment for all employees.

Under this Act, employers must:

The law also gives employees the right to a safe workplace and the responsibility to follow safety rules and use PPE provided by their employer.

The General Safety Regulations (GSR) form part of the OHS Act and cover PPE requirements in detail. They make it clear that employers must:

Employers who ignore these duties can face enforcement action from the Department of Employment and Labour, including written warnings, fines, or even prosecution in severe cases.

Safety Briefing and PPE Compliance

While the law places the primary duty on the employer, safety is a shared commitment. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the Employer Responsibilities and Employee Responsibilities necessary for a fully compliant workplace.

Employers have a legal and moral duty to ensure workplace safety. Their responsibilities include:

If an accident occurs due to inadequate or missing PPE, the employer can face fines, compensation claims, or even criminal charges.

Employees also share responsibility for safety. They must:

If an employee chooses not to wear PPE that has been provided and trained for, they can be held responsible for their injuries or face disciplinary action.

Let’s look at how these responsibilities work in practice:

Scenario 1:
An employer fails to provide gloves to workers who handle broken glass.
Outcome: The employer is responsible for any injuries because PPE was not provided.

Scenario 2:
The employer provides gloves, but they are too thin to protect against sharp materials.
Outcome: The employer is still at fault because the PPE was not suitable for the hazard.

Scenario 3:
The employer provides strong, cut-resistant gloves and trains workers, but one worker refuses to wear them.
Outcome: The worker is responsible for their own injury and may face disciplinary action.

Safety is a shared responsibility. Employers must create a safe working environment, but employees must also take safety seriously. PPE is not just an accessory or a workplace rule. It is a personal shield that can save lives.

The difference between a safe workday and a serious injury often comes down to one simple choice — whether or not to use the protective equipment provided.

Always remember:

“Do not take shortcuts with safety. Your life and your livelihood depend on it.”

According to the Occupational Health and Safety Act (Act 85 of 1993), the employer is legally required to provide PPE at no cost to employees. This includes purchasing, maintaining, and replacing it when necessary. The law makes it clear that workers should not bear any expense for safety equipment that is essential to their job.

Providing PPE is not only a legal requirement but also a moral one. When employers invest in quality PPE, they reduce the risk of accidents, improve productivity, and show employees that their well-being is a priority.

If an employee refuses to wear PPE that has been provided, properly explained, and trained for, they are violating workplace safety rules. The employer should take disciplinary action, which may include warnings, suspension or even dismissal.

If an injury occurs as a result of refusing PPE, the employee may lose the right to compensation under the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) because they failed to follow safety instructions.

Employers, however, must still ensure that the refusal is documented and that the employee was adequately trained and informed beforehand, and consequence management implemented.

PPE should be inspected before each use and replaced immediately if damaged, worn out, or expired. The lifespan of PPE varies depending on the type and frequency of use.

For example:

Employers should maintain a PPE replacement schedule and train staff to identify early signs of wear and tear. Regular maintenance ensures that PPE continues to provide full protection.

No, PPE should never be relied upon as the only safety measure. It is the last line of defence after all other methods in the Hierarchy of Controls have been applied.

For example, wearing a mask helps protect you from dust, but if proper ventilation (an engineering control) is added, the air quality improves for everyone. Similarly, wearing gloves is important, but replacing hazardous processes with safer designs is even better.

A strong safety culture combines PPE with elimination, substitution, engineering, and administrative controls to reduce risk from every angle.

PPE compliance and workplace safety are monitored by the Department of Employment and Labour, which enforces the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHS Act). Inspectors from the department have the authority to:

Employers found in violation can face fines, legal penalties, or prosecution. Regular internal audits and compliance with the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHS Act) help ensure readiness during inspections.

If PPE is not appropriate for the specific hazard, it can cause a false sense of safety and increase the risk of injury. The employer is responsible for ensuring that all PPE is correctly matched to the hazard, tested, and certified to meet safety standards.

For example, using thin gloves for chemical handling or wearing safety glasses instead of a full face shield during grinding tasks is unsafe. Employers should always consult safety professionals or PPE specialists to select the correct gear.

Generally, PPE should not be shared unless it is designed for multiple users and can be properly sanitized, such as certain types of hearing protection or face shields. Sharing items like gloves, respirators, or footwear can lead to hygiene issues, spread of infections, and improper fitting.

Each worker should have PPE that is personally fitted and assigned to them. Employers must ensure that all shared equipment is cleaned and inspected between uses.

Protect your employees. Protect your business. Choose PPE that meets SABS, NRCS,SAHPRA, CE, and ASTM standards and is backed by expert guidance.

📧 Email: support@realppe.co.za
📞 Call: +27 11 568 4247
🌐 Website: www.realppe.co.za

RealPPE – Trusted Safety Solutions for Every Workplace

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *